https://reuther.wayne.edu/taxonomy/term/1582 The taxonomy view with a depth of 0. en https://reuther.wayne.edu/node/10027 <p>McDonald v. UAL was part of a series of legal cases involving United Air Lines (UAL), their former flight attendants, and the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA). The cases centered around flight attendants who lost their job due to UAL’s no-marriage policy of the 1950s and 1960s in which the company insisted that their female flight attendants remain unmarried. If a stewardess married she had to transfer to a ground job, was forced to resign, or was fired. Previous cases against UAL included Mary Sprogis and Carole Romasanta, but these only involved flight attendants who had been fired or had filed a grievance. In 1977, Liane Buix McDonald filed another class action, this one to include all stewardesses who were fired, resigned, or transferred from the flight attendant position due to the no-marriage ruling. The collection includes court documents, UAL marriage grievances from the mid-1960s, lawyer’s correspondence, class membership lists, and research. It also includes individual cases to determine class membership. These cases include attorney notes, statements of claimants, questionnaires and answers, AFA and UAL responses, and documents provided by the claimant. </p> https://reuther.wayne.edu/node/10027#comments Association of Flight Attendants (U. S.)--Trials, litigation, etc. Association of Flight Attendants (U.S.) Flight attendants--Labor unions--United States Sex discrimination Stewardesses, Airline United Airlines Women&#039;s rights Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:50:28 -0500 srafferty 10027 at https://reuther.wayne.edu https://reuther.wayne.edu/node/10026 <p>McDonald v. UAL was part of a series of legal cases involving United Air Lines (UAL), their former flight attendants, and the Association of Flight Attendants (AFA). The cases centered around flight attendants who lost their job due to UAL’s no-marriage policy of the 1950s and 1960s in which the company insisted that their female flight attendants remain unmarried. If a stewardess married she had to transfer to a ground job, was forced to resign, or was fired. Previous cases against UAL included Mary Sprogis and Carole Romasanta, but these only involved flight attendants who had been fired or had filed a grievance. In 1977, Liane Buix McDonald filed another class action, this one to include all stewardesses who were fired, resigned, or transferred from the flight attendant position due to the no-marriage ruling. These records originated from the AFA’s Washington, D. C. Legal office and cover the period of 1980-89 and include court documents, correspondence, research and UAL seniority lists.</p> https://reuther.wayne.edu/node/10026#comments Association of Flight Attendants (U. S.)--Trials, litigation, etc. Association of Flight Attendants (U.S.) Flight attendants--Labor unions--United States Sex discrimination Stewardesses, Airline United Airlines Women&#039;s rights Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:44:44 -0500 srafferty 10026 at https://reuther.wayne.edu